On 01/12/23 08:09, Huang, Ying wrote: > Hi, Mike, > > Mike Kravetz writes: > > > On 01/10/23 17:53, Mike Kravetz wrote: > >> Just saw the following easily reproducible issue on next-20230110. Have not > >> verified it is related to/caused by this series, but it looks suspicious. > > > > Verified this is caused by the series, > > > > 734cbddcfe72 migrate_pages: organize stats with struct migrate_pages_stats > > to > > 323b933ba062 migrate_pages: batch flushing TLB > > > > in linux-next. > > Thanks for reporting. > > I tried this yesterday (next-20230111), but failed to reproduce it. Can > you share your kernel config? Is there any other setup needed? Config file is attached. Are you writing a REALLY big value to nr_hugepages? By REALLY big I mean a value that is impossible to fulfill. This will result in successful hugetlb allocations until __alloc_pages starts to fail. At this point we will be stressing compaction/migration trying to find more contiguous pages. Not sure if it matters, but I am running on a 2 node VM. The 2 nodes may be important as the hugetlb allocation code will try a little harder alternating between nodes that may perhaps stress compaction/migration more. > BTW: can you bisect to one specific commit which causes the bug in the > series? I should have some time to isolate in the next day or so. -- Mike Kravetz