From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm: kmem: add direct objcg pointer to task_struct
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:21:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6SEHTkHSNYQmv5k@P9FQF9L96D> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222135044.GB20830@blackbody.suse.cz>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 02:50:44PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:27:45AM -0800, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
> > To charge a freshly allocated kernel object to a memory cgroup, the
> > kernel needs to obtain an objcg pointer. Currently it does it
> > indirectly by obtaining the memcg pointer first and then calling to
> > __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg().
>
> Jinx [1].
>
> You report additional 7% improvement with this patch (focused on
> allocations only). I didn't see impressive numbers (different benchmark
> in [1]), so it looked as a microoptimization without big benefit to me.
Hi Michal!
Thank you for taking a look.
Do you have any numbers to share?
In general, I agree that it's a micro-optimization, but:
1) some people periodically complain that accounted allocations are slow
in comparison to non-accounted and slower than they were with page-based
accounting,
2) I don't see any particular hot point or obviously non-optimal place on the
allocation path.
so if we want to make it faster, we have to micro-optimize it here and there,
no other way. It's basically the question how many cache lines we touch.
Btw, I'm working on a patch 3 for this series, which in early tests brings
additional ~25% improvement in my benchmark, hopefully will post it soon as
a part of v1.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-20 18:27 [PATCH RFC 0/2] mm: kmem: optimize obj_cgroup pointer retrieval Roman Gushchin
2022-12-20 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] mm: kmem: optimize get_obj_cgroup_from_current() Roman Gushchin
2022-12-20 19:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-12-20 21:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-12-20 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm: kmem: add direct objcg pointer to task_struct Roman Gushchin
2022-12-20 20:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-12-22 13:50 ` Michal Koutný
2022-12-22 16:21 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2023-01-02 16:09 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6SEHTkHSNYQmv5k@P9FQF9L96D \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox