Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] zsmalloc: Implement writeback mechanism for zsmalloc

[Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:08:08PM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the suggestions so far and for the review, Minchan!
> Quick question about your last comment:
> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZPOOL
> >
> > Let's remove the ifdef machinery here.
> >
> >> +     /* Free all deferred handles from zs_free */
> >> +     free_handles(pool, zspage);
> >> +#endif
> 
> free_handles() here is for the deferred handle freeing, which is also
> under CONFIG_ZPOOL now, so I don't think we should remove the #ifdef
> CONFIG_ZPOOL here, no? Let me know if I'm misunderstanding your
> suggestion, or if you have any further comments regarding this patch.


What I meant is

#ifdef CONFIG_ZPOOL
/*
 * Free all the deferred handles whose objects are freed in zs_free.
 */
static void free_handles(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage)
{
       unsigned long handle = (unsigned long)zspage->deferred_handles;

       while (handle) {
               unsigned long nxt_handle = handle_to_obj(handle);

               cache_free_handle(pool, handle);
               handle = nxt_handle;
       }
}
#else
static inline void free_handles(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage) {}
#endif


And then we could do

__free_zspage
     free_handles(pool, zspage);


So without CONFIG_ZPOOL, the free_nandles function will be void.