From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_fault() RCU-safe
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:39:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2PgmMs5q5jOEN0K@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADrL8HUrCkjnBuD7=NJZ5gOBYWBbu=pa0sKp4FMnDH7OhtKvSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:04:01AM -0700, James Houghton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 2:30 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > RCU makes sure the pte_t* won't go away from under us. Please refer to the
> > comment above huge_pte_offset() for more information.
>
> Thanks for this series, Peter! :)
Thanks for reviewing, James!
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 5dc87e4e6780..6d336d286394 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -5822,6 +5822,8 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > int need_wait_lock = 0;
> > unsigned long haddr = address & huge_page_mask(h);
> >
> > + /* For huge_pte_offset() */
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, haddr, huge_page_size(h));
> > if (ptep) {
> > /*
> > @@ -5830,13 +5832,15 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > * not actually modifying content here.
> > */
> > entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))) {
> > migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, ptep);
>
> ptep is used here (and we dereference it in
> `__migration_entry_wait_huge`), so this looks unsafe to me. A simple
> way to fix this would be to move the migration entry check after the
> huge_pte_alloc call.
Right, I definitely overlooked the migration entries in both patches
(including the previous one that you commented), thanks for pointing that
out.
Though moving that after huge_pte_alloc() may have similar problem, iiuc.
The thing is we need either the vma lock or rcu to protect accessing the
pte*, while the pte* page and its pgtable lock can be accessed very deep
into the migration core (e.g., migration_entry_wait_on_locked()) as the
lock cannot be released before the thread queues itself into the waitqueue.
So far I don't see a good way to achieve this but add a hook to
migration_entry_wait_on_locked() so that any lock held for huge migrations
can be properly released after the pgtable lock released but before the
thread yields itself.
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-30 21:29 [PATCH RFC 00/10] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() thread-safe for pmd unshare Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] mm/hugetlb: Let vma_offset_start() to return start Peter Xu
2022-11-03 15:25 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] mm/hugetlb: Comment huge_pte_offset() for its locking requirements Peter Xu
2022-11-01 5:46 ` Nadav Amit
2022-11-02 20:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-03 15:42 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-03 18:11 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-03 18:38 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_vma_maps_page() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] mm/hugetlb: Make userfaultfd_huge_must_wait() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-11-02 18:06 ` James Houghton
2022-11-02 21:17 ` Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] mm/hugetlb: Make walk_hugetlb_range() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-11-06 8:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-06 16:41 ` Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] mm/hugetlb: Make page_vma_mapped_walk() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:29 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_follow_page_mask() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-11-02 18:24 ` James Houghton
2022-11-03 15:50 ` Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:30 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] mm/hugetlb: Make follow_hugetlb_page RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-10-30 21:30 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_fault() RCU-safe Peter Xu
2022-11-02 18:04 ` James Houghton
2022-11-03 15:39 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-10-30 21:30 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] mm/hugetlb: Comment at rest huge_pte_offset() places Peter Xu
2022-11-01 5:39 ` Nadav Amit
2022-11-02 21:21 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-04 0:21 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() thread-safe for pmd unshare Mike Kravetz
2022-11-04 15:02 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-04 15:44 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2PgmMs5q5jOEN0K@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox