From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: John Thomson <lists@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:16:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2PNLENnxxpqZ74g@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f88a5d34-de05-25d7-832d-36b3a3eddd72@suse.cz>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 09:33:28AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
> >> AFAICS before this patch, we "survive" "kmem_cache *s" being NULL as
> >> slab_pre_alloc_hook() will happen to return NULL and we bail out from
> >> slab_alloc_node(). But this is a side-effect, not an intended protection.
> >> Also the CONFIG_TRACING variant of kmalloc_trace() would have called
> >> trace_kmalloc dereferencing s->size anyway even before this patch.
> >>
> >> I don't think we should add WARNS in the slab hot paths just to prevent this
> >> rare error of using slab too early. At most VM_WARN... would be acceptable
> >> but still not necessary as crashing immediately from a NULL pointer is
> >> sufficient.
> >>
> >> So IMHO mips should fix their soc init,
> >
> > Yes, for the mips fix, John has proposed to defer the calling of prom_soc_init(),
> > which looks reasonable.
> >
> >> and we should look into the
> >> CONFIG_TRACING=n variant of kmalloc_trace(), to pass orig_size properly.
> >
> > You mean check if the pointer is NULL and bail out early.
>
> No I mean here:
>
> #else /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> /* Save a function call when CONFIG_TRACING=n */
> static __always_inline __alloc_size(3)
> void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
> {
> void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
>
> ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags);
> return ret;
> }
>
> we call kmem_cache_alloc() and discard the size parameter, so it will assume
> s->object_size (and as the side-effect, crash if s is NULL). We shouldn't
> add "s is NULL?" checks, but fix passing the size - probably switch to
> __kmem_cache_alloc_node()? and in the following kmalloc_node_trace() analogically.
Got it, thanks! I might have missed it during some rebasing for the
kmalloc wastage debug patch.
How about the following fix?
Thanks,
Feng
---
From 9f9fa9da8946fd44625f873c0f51167357075be1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 21:32:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slub: Add missing orig_size parameter for wastage debug
commit 6edf2576a6cc ("mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of
kmalloc") was introduced for debugging kmalloc memory wastage,
and it missed to pass the original request size for kmalloc_trace()
and kmalloc_node_trace() in CONFIG_TRACING=n path.
Fix it by using __kmem_cache_alloc_node() with correct original
request size.
Fixes: 6edf2576a6cc ("mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc")
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/slab.h | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 90877fcde70b..9691afa569e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_kmalloc_alignm
__alloc_size(1);
void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment
__malloc;
+void *__kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node,
+ size_t orig_size, unsigned long caller) __assume_slab_alignment
+ __malloc;
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
@@ -482,7 +485,8 @@ void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
static __always_inline __alloc_size(3)
void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size)
{
- void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags);
+ void *ret = __kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE,
+ size, _RET_IP_);
ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags);
return ret;
@@ -492,7 +496,8 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(4)
void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
int node, size_t size)
{
- void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node);
+ void *ret = __kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node,
+ size, _RET_IP_);
ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, gfpflags);
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 6:54 [PATCH v6 0/4] mm/slub: some debug enhancements for kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-23 11:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-24 7:08 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-30 19:23 ` John Thomson
2022-10-30 21:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-31 2:36 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 10:05 ` John Thomson
2022-10-31 11:36 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-31 11:42 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 0:18 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 2:41 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 7:57 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 9:20 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 9:31 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 10:33 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 10:42 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 13:55 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 19:39 ` John Thomson
2022-11-02 6:08 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02 7:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03 7:18 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 7:45 ` John Thomson
2022-11-03 8:16 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 5:54 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 8:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 14:16 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-11-03 14:36 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 17:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-04 3:52 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-26 19:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-26 20:15 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-27 1:22 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-27 2:42 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-13 14:00 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-10-14 5:59 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache Feng Tang
2022-09-20 19:20 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-21 12:02 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-24 18:05 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-25 11:26 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-25 16:31 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-27 3:03 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
2022-09-13 8:53 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2PNLENnxxpqZ74g@feng-clx \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lists@johnthomson.fastmail.com.au \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox