From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
miklos@szeredi.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fuse: Convert fuse_try_move_page() to use folios
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:24:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2FkV0wogVhMHkkO@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101175326.13265-3-vishal.moola@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:53:23AM -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> Converts the function to try to move folios instead of pages. Also
> converts fuse_check_page() to fuse_get_folio() since this is its only
> caller. This change removes 15 calls to compound_head().
This all looks good. I wonder if we should't add an assertion that the
page we're trying to steal is !large? It seems to me that there are
assumptions in this part of fuse that it's only dealing with order-0
pages, and if someone gives it a page that's part of a large folio,
it's going to be messy. Miklos, any thoughts?
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index 26817a2db463..204c332cd343 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -764,11 +764,11 @@ static int fuse_copy_do(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, void **val, unsigned *size)
> return ncpy;
> }
>
> -static int fuse_check_page(struct page *page)
> +static int fuse_check_folio(struct folio *folio)
> {
> - if (page_mapcount(page) ||
> - page->mapping != NULL ||
> - (page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP &
> + if (folio_mapped(folio) ||
> + folio->mapping != NULL ||
> + (folio->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP &
> ~(1 << PG_locked |
> 1 << PG_referenced |
> 1 << PG_uptodate |
> @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static int fuse_check_page(struct page *page)
> 1 << PG_reclaim |
> 1 << PG_waiters |
> LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK))) {
> - dump_page(page, "fuse: trying to steal weird page");
> + dump_page(&folio->page, "fuse: trying to steal weird page");
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -787,11 +787,11 @@ static int fuse_check_page(struct page *page)
> static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
> {
> int err;
> - struct page *oldpage = *pagep;
> - struct page *newpage;
> + struct folio *oldfolio = page_folio(*pagep);
> + struct folio *newfolio;
> struct pipe_buffer *buf = cs->pipebufs;
>
> - get_page(oldpage);
> + folio_get(oldfolio);
> err = unlock_request(cs->req);
> if (err)
> goto out_put_old;
> @@ -814,35 +814,36 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
> if (!pipe_buf_try_steal(cs->pipe, buf))
> goto out_fallback;
>
> - newpage = buf->page;
> + newfolio = page_folio(buf->page);
>
> - if (!PageUptodate(newpage))
> - SetPageUptodate(newpage);
> + if (!folio_test_uptodate(newfolio))
> + folio_mark_uptodate(newfolio);
>
> - ClearPageMappedToDisk(newpage);
> + folio_clear_mappedtodisk(newfolio);
>
> - if (fuse_check_page(newpage) != 0)
> + if (fuse_check_folio(newfolio) != 0)
> goto out_fallback_unlock;
>
> /*
> * This is a new and locked page, it shouldn't be mapped or
> * have any special flags on it
> */
> - if (WARN_ON(page_mapped(oldpage)))
> + if (WARN_ON(folio_mapped(oldfolio)))
> goto out_fallback_unlock;
> - if (WARN_ON(page_has_private(oldpage)))
> + if (WARN_ON(folio_has_private(oldfolio)))
> goto out_fallback_unlock;
> - if (WARN_ON(PageDirty(oldpage) || PageWriteback(oldpage)))
> + if (WARN_ON(folio_test_dirty(oldfolio) ||
> + folio_test_writeback(oldfolio)))
> goto out_fallback_unlock;
> - if (WARN_ON(PageMlocked(oldpage)))
> + if (WARN_ON(folio_test_mlocked(oldfolio)))
> goto out_fallback_unlock;
>
> - replace_page_cache_folio(page_folio(oldpage), page_folio(newpage));
> + replace_page_cache_folio(oldfolio, newfolio);
>
> - get_page(newpage);
> + folio_get(newfolio);
>
> if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
> - lru_cache_add(newpage);
> + folio_add_lru(newfolio);
>
> /*
> * Release while we have extra ref on stolen page. Otherwise
> @@ -855,28 +856,28 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fuse_copy_state *cs, struct page **pagep)
> if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &cs->req->flags))
> err = -ENOENT;
> else
> - *pagep = newpage;
> + *pagep = &newfolio->page;
> spin_unlock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
>
> if (err) {
> - unlock_page(newpage);
> - put_page(newpage);
> + folio_unlock(newfolio);
> + folio_put(newfolio);
> goto out_put_old;
> }
>
> - unlock_page(oldpage);
> + folio_unlock(oldfolio);
> /* Drop ref for ap->pages[] array */
> - put_page(oldpage);
> + folio_put(oldfolio);
> cs->len = 0;
>
> err = 0;
> out_put_old:
> /* Drop ref obtained in this function */
> - put_page(oldpage);
> + folio_put(oldfolio);
> return err;
>
> out_fallback_unlock:
> - unlock_page(newpage);
> + folio_unlock(newfolio);
> out_fallback:
> cs->pg = buf->page;
> cs->offset = buf->offset;
> --
> 2.38.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 17:53 [PATCH 0/5] Removing the lru_cache_add() wrapper Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] filemap: Convert replace_page_cache_page() to replace_page_cache_folio() Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-11-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] fuse: Convert fuse_try_move_page() to use folios Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 18:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-11-10 18:36 ` Vishal Moola
2022-11-14 13:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-11-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] userfualtfd: Replace lru_cache functions with folio_add functions Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 18:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-11-02 19:02 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-02 19:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-11-02 20:44 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-03 17:34 ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-11-03 17:56 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-02 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] khugepage: Replace lru_cache_add() with folio_add_lru() Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 18:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-11-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] folio-compat: Remove lru_cache_add() Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2022-11-01 18:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-11-29 19:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] Removing the lru_cache_add() wrapper Vishal Moola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2FkV0wogVhMHkkO@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox