From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect cpuset policy during page demotion
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:21:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1kmOaXvzwRv/tza@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44e485d4-acf5-865d-17fe-13be1c1b430b@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed 26-10-22 17:38:06, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
> On 10/26/22 4:32 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 26-10-22 16:12:25, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
> >> On 10/26/22 2:49 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Wed 26-10-22 16:00:13, Feng Tang wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 03:49:48PM +0800, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
> >>>>> On 10/26/22 1:13 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> >>>>>> In page reclaim path, memory could be demoted from faster memory tier
> >>>>>> to slower memory tier. Currently, there is no check about cpuset's
> >>>>>> memory policy, that even if the target demotion node is not allowd
> >>>>>> by cpuset, the demotion will still happen, which breaks the cpuset
> >>>>>> semantics.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So add cpuset policy check in the demotion path and skip demotion
> >>>>>> if the demotion targets are not allowed by cpuset.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What about the vma policy or the task memory policy? Shouldn't we respect
> >>>>> those memory policy restrictions while demoting the page?
> >>>>
> >>>> Good question! We have some basic patches to consider memory policy
> >>>> in demotion path too, which are still under test, and will be posted
> >>>> soon. And the basic idea is similar to this patch.
> >>>
> >>> For that you need to consult each vma and it's owning task(s) and that
> >>> to me sounds like something to be done in folio_check_references.
> >>> Relying on memcg to get a cpuset cgroup is really ugly and not really
> >>> 100% correct. Memory controller might be disabled and then you do not
> >>> have your association anymore.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I was looking at this recently and I am wondering whether we should worry about VM_SHARE
> >> vmas.
> >>
> >> ie, page_to_policy() can just reverse lookup just one VMA and fetch the policy right?
> >
> > How would that help for private mappings shared between parent/child?
>
>
> this is MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_SHARED?
This is not a valid combination IIRC. What I meant is a simple
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON that is CoW shared between parent and child.
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-26 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 7:43 Feng Tang
2022-10-26 7:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 8:00 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 10:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 11:02 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 12:21 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2022-10-26 12:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 10:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:20 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 15:59 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 17:57 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27 7:11 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 7:45 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 7:51 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 17:55 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-28 3:37 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28 5:54 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-28 17:23 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31 1:56 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31 2:19 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28 5:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-28 17:16 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31 1:53 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 6:47 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 7:10 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 7:39 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 8:01 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 9:31 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 12:29 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 23:22 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31 8:51 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31 9:18 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31 14:09 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-07 8:05 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-07 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-01 3:17 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-26 8:26 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-10-26 8:37 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 14:36 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-27 5:57 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 5:13 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 5:49 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 6:05 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1kmOaXvzwRv/tza@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox