From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Bergen <ebergen@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: split khugepaged stats from direct reclaim stats
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:43:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1hKaHmzVJ1cJPyn@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1gaBXp+IENVIU7z@casper.infradead.org>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 06:16:53PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:05:19PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > +static int reclaimer_offset(void)
> > +{
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != 1);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != 2);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGDEMOTE_DIRECT - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD != 1);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGDEMOTE_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD != 2);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSCAN_DIRECT - PGSCAN_KSWAPD != 1);
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSCAN_KHUGEPAGED - PGSCAN_KSWAPD != 2);
> > +
> > + if (current_is_kswapd())
> > + return 0;
> > + if (current_is_khugepaged())
> > + return 2;
> > + return 1;
> > +}
>
> Would this be simpler as ...
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD !=
> PGDEMOTE_DIRECT - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD !=
> PGSCAN_DIRECT - PGSCAN_KSWAPD);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD !=
> PGDEMOTE_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD !=
> PGSCAN_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD);
>
> if (current_is_kswapd())
> return 0;
> if (current_is_khugepaged())
> return PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD;
> return PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD;
>
> Not that I think we'd ever want to separate them, but it is perhaps a
> bit less magic?
Yeah that looks better. I'll do that in v2, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 17:05 Johannes Weiner
2022-10-25 17:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-10-25 20:43 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2022-10-25 19:40 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-25 20:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-25 21:53 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-26 17:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-26 20:51 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27 2:41 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-27 14:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-27 20:43 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-28 14:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-28 17:41 ` Yosry Ahmed
2022-10-31 16:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-10-31 16:46 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1hKaHmzVJ1cJPyn@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebergen@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox