linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@amd.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 10/15] x86/mm, iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVM mutually exclusive
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:07:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y08HgXqvNSpTUgWe@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018113358.7833-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:33:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> IOMMU and SVM-capable devices know nothing about LAM and only expect
> canonical addresses. Attempt to pass down tagged pointer will lead to
> address translation failure.
> 
> By default do not allow to enable both LAM and use SVM in the same
> process.
> 
> The new ARCH_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM arch_prctl() overrides the limitation.
> By using the arch_prctl() userspace takes responsibility to never pass
> tagged address to the device.

Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h         |  6 ++++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h  |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c       | 13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mmu_context.h        |  4 ++++
>  6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
> index 2fdb390040b5..cce9b32b0d6d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
> @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  
>  /* Uprobes on this MM assume 32-bit code */
> -#define MM_CONTEXT_UPROBE_IA32	BIT(0)
> +#define MM_CONTEXT_UPROBE_IA32		BIT(0)
>  /* vsyscall page is accessible on this MM */
> -#define MM_CONTEXT_HAS_VSYSCALL	BIT(1)
> +#define MM_CONTEXT_HAS_VSYSCALL		BIT(1)

Nit: Looks like the two above format changes got in here :-)

Cheers,
Ashok


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 11:33 [PATCHv10 00/15] Linear Address Masking enabling Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 01/15] x86/mm: Fix CR3_ADDR_MASK Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 02/15] x86: CPUID and CR3/CR4 flags for Linear Address Masking Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 03/15] mm: Pass down mm_struct to untagged_addr() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 04/15] x86/mm: Handle LAM on context switch Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 05/15] x86/uaccess: Provide untagged_addr() and remove tags before address check Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 06/15] KVM: Serialize tagged address check against tagging enabling Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 07/15] x86/mm: Provide arch_prctl() interface for LAM Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 08/15] x86/mm: Reduce untagged_addr() overhead until the first LAM user Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 09/15] x86: Expose untagging mask in /proc/$PID/arch_status Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 21:02   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-18 22:24     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 22:41       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 10/15] x86/mm, iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVM mutually exclusive Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 20:07   ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-10-18 22:35     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 23:59       ` Ashok Raj
2022-10-18 21:00   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-18 22:33     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 22:43       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-19  0:17         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-19  7:04   ` Vasant Hegde
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 11/15] selftests/x86/lam: Add malloc and tag-bits test cases for linear-address masking Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 12/15] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 13/15] selftests/x86/lam: Add io_uring " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 14/15] selftests/x86/lam: Add inherit " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-18 11:33 ` [PATCHv10 15/15] selftests/x86/lam: Add ARCH_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM " Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y08HgXqvNSpTUgWe@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=tarasmadan@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox