From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
To: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, nivedita@alum.mit.edu,
keescook@chromium.org, jroedel@suse.de, hushiyuan@huawei.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kaslr: support separate multiple memmaps parameter parsing
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 15:22:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/TKfx57U1zWKzXz@rani.riverdale.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201222113124.35367-1-zhangpan26@huawei.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 07:31:24PM +0800, Pan Zhang wrote:
> When the kernel is loading,
> the load address of the kernel needs to be calculated firstly.
>
> If the kernel address space layout randomization(`kaslr`) is enabled,
> the memory range reserved by the memmap parameter will be excluded
> to avoid loading the kernel address into the memmap reserved area.
>
> Currently, this is what the manual says:
> `memmap = nn [KMG] @ss [KMG]
> [KNL] Force usage of a specific region of memory.
> Region of memory to be used is from ss to ss + nn.
> If @ss [KMG] is omitted, it is equivalent to mem = nn [KMG],
> which limits max address to nn [KMG].
> Multiple different regions can be specified,
> comma delimited.
> Example:
> memmap=100M@2G, 100M#3G, 1G!1024G
> `
>
> Can we relax the use of memmap?
> In our production environment we see many people who use it like this:
> Separate multiple memmaps parameters to reserve memory,
> memmap=xx\$xxx memmap=xx\$xxx memmap=xx\$xxx memmap=xx\$xxx memmap=xx\$xxx
>
> If this format is used, and the reserved memory segment is greater than 4,
> there is no way to parse the 5th and subsequent memmaps and the kaslr cannot be disabled by `memmap_too_large`
> so the kernel loading address may fall within the memmap range
> (reserved memory area from memmap after fourth segment),
> which will have bad consequences for use of reserved memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index d7408af..24a2778 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -203,9 +203,6 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(enum parse_mode mode, char *str)
> {
> static int i;
>
> - if (i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS)
> - return;
> -
> while (str && (i < MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS)) {
> int rc;
> unsigned long long start, size;
> @@ -233,7 +230,7 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(enum parse_mode mode, char *str)
> }
>
> /* More than 4 memmaps, fail kaslr */
> - if ((i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS) && str)
> + if ((i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS) && !memmap_too_large)
I think this should stay the way it was, otherwise KASLR will be
disabled even if exactly MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS were specified. Removing the
early return as you did above should be enough to cause the flag to be
set if a 5th memmap is specified in a separate parameter, right?
> memmap_too_large = true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 11:31 Pan Zhang
2021-01-05 20:22 ` Arvind Sankar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/TKfx57U1zWKzXz@rani.riverdale.lan \
--to=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangpan26@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox