From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4CCC433E0 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2296E22CBE for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:38:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2296E22CBE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6E93B6B02A3; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:38:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 699286B02A5; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:38:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5AF328D0090; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:38:22 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0067.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.67]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469736B02A3 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:38:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08128181AEF0B for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:38:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77696924844.10.goat47_06135cf27515 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA68A16A4AD for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: goat47_06135cf27515 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6067 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id d26so2113973wrb.12 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GDpfESbYxGF6Trv+/Pck55IrVLlVuQoy2fDX+R3JzHs=; b=lTj2eZ0DptoNXlhXwRR5h7+wYAQ7o37MGF02nPramm3x/YM9nVgJhGn8jJv2jmZyv4 kmaIEelTV23V817at6dh8ahtVwTVxSYyUfFnerkbisZotkwb3jxfPUoGxPvXDPAybgkW BahdhTkMI14s0CtrZUEiy7RZoAA5ay58wksKBkU7qhhCJtS1lyx/lGZsHHVSLDpsTkiN ESIOecg2QJwQIfun7fGdKf+iglO0SvElsh9JCuFEgVaZ4IEQfzyPhSrznKyw5/dNpbYE UulwAPcgAUaT3MHBAceViOsC6wh0vVIogFTIZJMwKGl3XahEjQe3t2dAUAvs2OzireaB SQbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GDpfESbYxGF6Trv+/Pck55IrVLlVuQoy2fDX+R3JzHs=; b=T1/22WLNCOIlV6NsU7N2MDpJocFpEw5MwXq4FUnqnVe49Otwj3ckkB1Q9JyPLbHkzM SL/Z42vj1BGCYWy6t1ZAOriTjvHp1fyhvZsTKj/JOu/Gv0vcyxomrg6GqomBmWrRmtTF iFs1MU9dQ5wJ26oBMF+2470m3HX2S9QaMZzJzp4BuIBwnhF2ZIH6nY1SbZ7KPIZt035k 9sUI55iDY0uORerZhZkkf0C/Ts6s0I3dFPApR0LFC9Hrg+dZUXJ3Yl8giblCsEShBtTu DvYbGudvcFHZ6VKFDiHCRFeOo+m6T6nGR3Wv/i8gbDC1QtnQB+ju/Orr8qFREyBTmuAZ aazg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53381IhYqdVgpX8b0+bZWLxvBtoxzmcjW3XHW/i07L/lHyoPxlGv Pfx7rSvMbNcvNiKYYyQtGT+2hA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLzef9n7OBMWDe4KNRiKBdnjf0DtXgvotb9wvOQP0nz95VMJGs4kAznFJQxjUXvpC2zDMsag== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db51:: with SMTP id f17mr3957788wrj.83.1610451500054; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from elver.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:13:f693:9fff:fef4:2449]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o74sm3825348wme.36.2021.01.12.03.38.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:38:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:38:13 +0100 From: Marco Elver To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Catalin Marinas , Vincenzo Frascino , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Will Deacon , Andrey Ryabinin , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] kasan: clarify HW_TAGS impact on TBI Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.2 (2020-11-20) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Mention in the documentation that enabling CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS > always results in in-kernel TBI (Top Byte Ignore) being enabled. > > Also do a few minor documentation cleanups. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Iba2a6697e3c6304cb53f89ec61dedc77fa29e3ae Reviewed-by: Marco Elver > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 16 +++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > index 0fc3fb1860c4..26c99852a852 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > @@ -147,15 +147,14 @@ negative values to distinguish between different kinds of inaccessible memory > like redzones or freed memory (see mm/kasan/kasan.h). > > In the report above the arrows point to the shadow byte 03, which means that > -the accessed address is partially accessible. > - > -For tag-based KASAN this last report section shows the memory tags around the > -accessed address (see `Implementation details`_ section). > +the accessed address is partially accessible. For tag-based KASAN modes this > +last report section shows the memory tags around the accessed address > +(see the `Implementation details`_ section). > > Boot parameters > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -Hardware tag-based KASAN mode (see the section about different mode below) is > +Hardware tag-based KASAN mode (see the section about various modes below) is > intended for use in production as a security mitigation. Therefore it supports > boot parameters that allow to disable KASAN competely or otherwise control > particular KASAN features. > @@ -305,6 +304,13 @@ reserved to tag freed memory regions. > Hardware tag-based KASAN currently only supports tagging of > kmem_cache_alloc/kmalloc and page_alloc memory. > > +If the hardware doesn't support MTE (pre ARMv8.5), hardware tag-based KASAN > +won't be enabled. In this case all boot parameters are ignored. > + > +Note, that enabling CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS always results in in-kernel TBI being > +enabled. Even when kasan.mode=off is provided, or when the hardware doesn't > +support MTE (but supports TBI). > + > What memory accesses are sanitised by KASAN? > -------------------------------------------- > > -- > 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog >