From: Adrian Huang12 <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and vmap_lazy_nr
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:38:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYZPR03MB61927CAD315EEC000854481BB3852@TYZPR03MB6192.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417161216.88318-4-urezki@gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org> On Behalf
> Of Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 12:12 AM
> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Baoquan He
> <bhe@redhat.com>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>; Uladzislau Rezki
> <urezki@gmail.com>; Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>;
> Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> Subject: [External] [PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and
> vmap_lazy_nr
>
> Currently both atomics share one cache-line:
>
> <snip>
> ...
> ffffffff83eab400 b vmap_lazy_nr
> ffffffff83eab408 b nr_vmalloc_pages
> ...
> <snip>
>
> those are global variables and they are only 8 bytes apart.
> Since they are modified by different threads this causes a false sharing. This
> can lead to a performance drop due to unnecessary cache invalidations.
>
> After this patch it is aligned to a cache line boundary:
>
> <snip>
> ...
> ffffffff8260a600 d vmap_lazy_nr
> ffffffff8260a640 d nr_vmalloc_pages
> ...
> <snip>
>
> Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Tested-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index
> 77da4613f07ff..54f60d62051da 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1008,7 +1008,8 @@ static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(vmap_notify_list);
> static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work); static
> DECLARE_WORK(drain_vmap_work, drain_vmap_area_work);
>
> -static atomic_long_t nr_vmalloc_pages;
> +static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_long_t nr_vmalloc_pages;
> +static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_long_t vmap_lazy_nr;
>
> unsigned long vmalloc_nr_pages(void)
> {
> @@ -2117,8 +2118,6 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void)
> return log * (32UL * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_SIZE); }
>
> -static atomic_long_t vmap_lazy_nr = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
> -
> /*
> * Serialize vmap purging. There is no actual critical section protected
> * by this lock, but we want to avoid concurrent calls for performance
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 16:12 [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Allow built-in execution Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:37 ` Adrian Huang12
2025-06-13 13:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-13 14:19 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-13 14:23 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-13 14:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-14 10:27 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-14 15:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] MAINTAINERS: Add test_vmalloc.c to VMALLOC section Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and vmap_lazy_nr Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 13:26 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:38 ` Adrian Huang12 [this message]
2025-04-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup kernel test robot
2025-04-22 12:59 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-24 13:35 ` Adrian Huang12
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TYZPR03MB61927CAD315EEC000854481BB3852@TYZPR03MB6192.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox