From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"joey.gouly@arm.com" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ryan.roberts@arm.com" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"shahuang@redhat.com" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"ddutile@redhat.com" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>, Uday Dhoke <udhoke@nvidia.com>,
Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@nvidia.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"sebastianene@google.com" <sebastianene@google.com>,
"coltonlewis@google.com" <coltonlewis@google.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"yi.l.liu@intel.com" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"tabba@google.com" <tabba@google.com>,
"qperret@google.com" <qperret@google.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"maobibo@loongson.cn" <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 05:03:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SA1PR12MB7199C4F31576787D0400902EB045A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250621042111.3992-1-ankita@nvidia.com>
> Grace based platforms such as Grace Hopper/Blackwell Superchips have
> CPU accessible cache coherent GPU memory. The GPU device memory is
> essentially a DDR memory and retains properties such as cacheability,
> unaligned accesses, atomics and handling of executable faults. This
> requires the device memory to be mapped as NORMAL in stage-2.
>
> Today KVM forces the memory to either NORMAL or DEVICE_nGnRE depending
> on whether the memory region is added to the kernel. The KVM code is
> thus restrictive and prevents device memory that is not added to the
> kernel to be marked as cacheable. The patch aims to solve this.
>
> A cachebility check is made by consulting the VMA pgprot value. If
> the pgprot mapping type is cacheable, it is considered safe to be
> mapped cacheable as the KVM S2 will have the same Normal memory type
> as the VMA has in the S1 and KVM has no additional responsibility
> for safety.
>
> Note when FWB (Force Write Back) is not enabled, the kernel expects to
> trivially do cache management by flushing the memory by linearly
> converting a kvm_pte to phys_addr to a KVA. The cache management thus
> relies on memory being mapped. Since the GPU device memory is not kernel
> mapped, exit when the FWB is not supported. Similarly, ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC
> allows KVM to avoid flushing the icache and turns icache_inval_pou() into
> a NOP. So the cacheable PFNMAP is made contingent on these two hardware
> features.
>
> The ability to safely do the cacheable mapping of PFNMAP is exposed
> through a KVM capability for userspace consumption.
>
> The changes are heavily influenced by the discussions among
> maintainers Marc Zyngier and Oliver Upton besides Jason Gunthorpe,
> Catalin Marinas, David Hildenbrand, Sean Christopherson [1]. Many
> thanks for their valuable suggestions.
>
> Applied over next-20250610 and tested on the Grace Blackwell
> platform by booting up VM, loading NVIDIA module [2] and running
> nvidia-smi in the VM.
>
> To run CUDA workloads, there is a dependency on the IOMMUFD and the
> Nested Page Table patches being worked on separately by Nicolin Chen.
> (nicolinc@nvidia.com). NVIDIA has provided git repositories which
> includes all the requisite kernel [3] and Qemu [4] patches in case
> one wants to try.
>
> v8 -> v9
> 1. Included MIXEDMAP to also be considered for cacheable mapping.
> (Jason Gunthorpe).
> 2. Minor text nits (Jason Gunthorpe).
A humble reminder for the review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-21 4:21 ankita
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] KVM: arm64: Rename the device variable to s2_force_noncacheable ankita
2025-07-04 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] KVM: arm64: Update the check to detect device memory ankita
2025-07-04 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-06-27 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-30 1:56 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-30 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:04 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 16:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-08 12:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-07-04 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-07-04 14:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:51 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-21 4:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
2025-07-04 13:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 15:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 16:20 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-04 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27 5:03 ` Ankit Agrawal [this message]
2025-07-02 9:33 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-02 16:51 ` Donald Dutile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SA1PR12MB7199C4F31576787D0400902EB045A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox