From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"joey.gouly@arm.com" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"ryan.roberts@arm.com" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"shahuang@redhat.com" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"ddutile@redhat.com" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>, Uday Dhoke <udhoke@nvidia.com>,
Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@nvidia.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"sebastianene@google.com" <sebastianene@google.com>,
"coltonlewis@google.com" <coltonlewis@google.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"yi.l.liu@intel.com" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"tabba@google.com" <tabba@google.com>,
"qperret@google.com" <qperret@google.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"maobibo@loongson.cn" <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] KVM: arm64: Rename symbols to reflect whether CMO may be used
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 02:22:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SA1PR12MB7199C4E718B01D373C9554B7B07DA@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFLOnN_Ha3s724rK@arm.com>
Thanks Catalin for reviewing the patch.
>> -static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>> +static bool kvm_can_use_cmo_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>> {
>> - return !pfn_is_map_memory(pfn);
>> + return pfn_is_map_memory(pfn);
>> }
>
> I wonder, why not just use pfn_is_map_memory() directly? At a quick
> grep, it's only used in one place and your patches don't seem to modify
> this function further.
Ok sure, will make the change.
>> Currently, the kvm_is_device_pfn() detects if the memory is kernel
>> mapped. It thus implies whether KVM can use Cache Maintenance
>> Operations (CMOs) on that PFN. Rename the function to reflect this.
>>
>> Additionally, the "device" variable is effectively trying to setup the S2
>> to prevent CMOs. Calling it 'disable_cmo' would make this code clearer.
>
> I'm not sure CMOs is the only reason. Another is to prevent the guest
> from mapping device memory as something other than Device with
> possible implications for external aborts.
Ack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 6:55 [PATCH v7 0/5] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-06-18 6:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] KVM: arm64: Rename symbols to reflect whether CMO may be used ankita
2025-06-18 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-18 14:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 2:22 ` Ankit Agrawal [this message]
2025-06-18 6:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-06-18 15:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 2:21 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-18 6:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-06-18 16:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-18 6:55 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-06-18 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-18 16:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-19 12:14 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-19 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-19 16:03 ` Donald Dutile
2025-06-19 16:46 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-18 6:55 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SA1PR12MB7199C4E718B01D373C9554B7B07DA@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox