linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	"joey.gouly@arm.com" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"yuzenghui@huawei.com" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"ryan.roberts@arm.com" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"shahuang@redhat.com" <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"ddutile@redhat.com" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
	"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
	Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
	Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
	Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>, Uday Dhoke <udhoke@nvidia.com>,
	Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@nvidia.com>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"sebastianene@google.com" <sebastianene@google.com>,
	"coltonlewis@google.com" <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"yi.l.liu@intel.com" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"gshan@redhat.com" <gshan@redhat.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"tabba@google.com" <tabba@google.com>,
	"qperret@google.com" <qperret@google.com>,
	"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"maobibo@loongson.cn" <maobibo@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 16:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SA1PR12MB7199AB9F09DF483AEC41777AB042A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250704150442.GI1410929@nvidia.com>

Thanks Jason and David for reviewing the patch!

>> >
>> > I don't know if any VMM will ever use this, but it looks OK
>>
>> So, should we defer it to the point where we actually have a use case?
>>
>> I mean, patch #4 could be simplified by modifying arm64 code in patch #5
>> only. No need for a common kvm_arch function etc.
>
> IDK, I think Marc and Oliver are right it makes sense to have it, I
> just don't really see how a VMM would make use of it..
>
> Jason

Right, it was also pointed out that the VMM could make use of it
for early termination during VM migration between incompatible 
systems (i.e. across systems with and without FWB and CACHE DIC).





  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-04 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-21  4:21 [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] KVM: arm64: Rename the device variable to s2_force_noncacheable ankita
2025-07-04 13:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 13:57   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] KVM: arm64: Update the check to detect device memory ankita
2025-07-04 13:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-06-27 13:49   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-30  1:56     ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-30 12:25       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 12:21         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:04           ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 16:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-08 12:47               ` Will Deacon
2025-07-04 13:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] KVM: arm64: New function to determine hardware cache management support ankita
2025-07-04 13:47   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-07-04 14:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:13     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 16:51       ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-06-21  4:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
2025-07-04 13:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 14:15     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-04 15:04       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-04 16:20         ` Ankit Agrawal [this message]
2025-07-04 16:56           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-27  5:03 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-02  9:33 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-07-02 16:51   ` Donald Dutile

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SA1PR12MB7199AB9F09DF483AEC41777AB042A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=danw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox