From: David Rientjes <rientjes@cs.washington.edu>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: balbir@in.ibm.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com, dev@openvz.org,
sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com,
matthltc@us.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com,
menage@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:00:53 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610312158240.18766@attu4.cs.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4547305A.9070903@openvz.org>
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Paul Menage won't agree. He believes that interface must come first.
> I also remind you that the latest beancounter patch provides all the
> stuff we're discussing. It may move tasks, limit all three resources
> discussed, reclaim memory and so on. And configfs interface could be
> attached easily.
>
There's really two different interfaces: those to the controller and those
to the container. While the configfs (or simpler fs implementation solely
for our purposes) is the most logical because of its inherent hierarchial
nature, it seems like the only criticism on that has come from UBC. From
my understanding of beancounter, it could be implemented on top of any
such container abstraction anyway.
David
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-01 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061030103356.GA16833@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <4545D51A.1060808@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <4546212B.4010603@openvz.org>
[not found] ` <454638D2.7050306@in.ibm.com>
2006-10-30 18:07 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-31 8:57 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-10-31 9:19 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-31 9:25 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-10-31 10:10 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-31 10:19 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-10-31 9:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-31 10:36 ` Balbir Singh
[not found] ` <45470DF4.70405@openvz.org>
2006-10-31 10:54 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-31 11:15 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-10-31 12:39 ` Balbir Singh
2006-10-31 14:19 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-10-31 16:54 ` Paul Menage
2006-11-01 6:00 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2006-11-01 8:05 ` Pavel Emelianov
2006-11-01 8:35 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610312158240.18766@attu4.cs.washington.edu \
--to=rientjes@cs.washington.edu \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox