Re: [RFC PATCH 12/15] ima-path-check rework

[Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>]

On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Eric Paris wrote:

I've not checked through this whole patch and your whole patchset,
but certainly when IMA came in, I felt (and said) that these calls
should be done at a lower level, so as not to affect each filesystem.
So I thoroughly approve of the direction of your patchset, even
though I cannot vouch for the details of it.  Thank you, Eric.

Hugh

> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/swap.h>
> -#include <linux/ima.h>
>  
>  static struct vfsmount *shm_mnt;
>  
> @@ -2655,8 +2654,6 @@ struct file *shmem_file_setup(const char *name, loff_t size, unsigned long flags
>  	if (!file)
>  		goto put_dentry;
>  
> -	ima_counts_get(file);
> -
>  #ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>  	error = ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping(inode, size);
>  	if (error) {

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>