linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Elladan <elladan@eskimo.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] vmscan: limit VM_EXEC protection to file pages
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:33:58 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910131221220.25854@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013080054.GA20395@localhost>

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:

> It is possible to have !Anon but SwapBacked pages, and some apps could
> create huge number of such pages with MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS. These
> pages go into the ANON lru list, and hence shall not be protected: we
> only care mapped executable files. Failing to do so may trigger OOM.
> 
> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

I'm not going to stand against this patch.  But I would like to point
out that it will "penalize" (well, no longer favour) executables being
run from a tmpfs.  Probably not a big deal.

And I want to put on record that (like Andrea) I really loathe this
(vm_flags & VM_EXEC) test: it's a heuristic unlike any other in page
reclaim, and one that is open to any application writer to take unfair
advantage of.

I know that it's there to make some things work better, and that it
has been successful (though now inevitably it's found to require a
tweak - how long until its next tweak?).  But I do hope that one
day you will come up with something much more satisfactory here.

Hugh

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux.orig/mm/vmscan.c	2009-10-13 09:49:05.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/mm/vmscan.c	2009-10-13 09:49:37.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
>  			 * IO, plus JVM can create lots of anon VM_EXEC pages,
>  			 * so we ignore them here.
>  			 */
> -			if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && !PageAnon(page)) {
> +			if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && page_is_file_cache(page)) {
>  				list_add(&page->lru, &l_active);
>  				continue;
>  			}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-12 20:44 oomkiller over-ambitious after "vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first class citizen" (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2009-10-12 21:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-13  2:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-13  2:32   ` Rik van Riel
2009-10-13  8:00     ` [PATCH][BUGFIX] vmscan: limit VM_EXEC protection to file pages Wu Fengguang
2009-10-13  8:03       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-13 11:33       ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2009-10-13  5:50   ` oomkiller over-ambitious after "vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first class citizen" (bisected) Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0910131221220.25854@sister.anvils \
    --to=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=elladan@eskimo.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox