From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:03:24 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator In-Reply-To: <20081215141647.GC30163@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20081212002518.GH8294@wotan.suse.de> <20081214230407.GB7318@wotan.suse.de> <20081215141647.GC30163@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , bcrl@kvack.org, list-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Nick Piggin wrote: > > A memoryless node is a case where all allocations will be like that. > > Yes. Can the memoryless node revert to a default (closest) memory node? It should do that but the node we allocat from will still be not the local node. The local_node will only have processors. No memory. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org