From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm: remove try_to_munlock from vmscan
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:29:29 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811241928260.3700@blonde.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227548092.6937.23.camel@lts-notebook>
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 22:03 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Hugh: Thanks for doing this. Another item on my to-do list, as noted
> in the document.
Taking the page_count() check out of remove_exclusive_swap_page()
has been on my to-do list for about four years, so I'd have been
extra ashamed if you got there before me. Most of that time I'd
been thinking we needed a page_mapcount() check instead, it's only
recently I've realized that it was silly to be requiring "exclusive"
in the first place.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> > ---
> > I've not tested this against whatever test showed the need for that
> > try_to_munlock() in shrink_page_list() in the first place. Rik or Lee,
> > please, would you have the time to run that test on the next -mm that has
> > this patch in, to check that I've not messed things up? Alternatively,
> > please point me to such a test - but I think you've been targeting
> > larger machines than I have access to - thanks.
>
> I will rerun my test workload when this shows up in mmotm.
Great, thanks a lot.
>
> I added the extra try_to_munlock() [TODO: maybe "page_mlocked()" is
> better name?]
I think it's a much better name, so left in that part of the TODO;
but for some reason felt I'd better leave that change to you.
> to prevent using swap space for pages that were destined
> for the unevictable list. This is more likely, I think, now that we've
> removed the lru_drain_all() calls from the mlock[all]() handlers. Back
> when I added this, I wasn't sure that we could reliably remove swap from
> a page with an arbitrary number of mappers. Rik had warned against
> making that assumption.
Yes, it's bitten us before. I expect you could have handled it (in
all but racy cases) by use of your remove_exclusive_swap_page_count()
but it's a lot easier never having to worry about exclusivity at all.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-24 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-23 21:53 [PATCH 0/8] mm: from gup to vmscan Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 21:55 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: gup persist for write permission Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: wp lock page before deciding cow Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 21:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: reuse_swap_page replaces can_share_swap_page Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:11 ` [PATCH] memcg: memswap controller core swapcache fixes Hugh Dickins
2008-11-24 5:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-24 6:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-24 12:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-11-24 12:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-23 22:43 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: reuse_swap_page replaces can_share_swap_page Rik van Riel
2008-11-23 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm: try_to_free_swap replaces remove_exclusive_swap_page Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: try_to_unuse check removing right swap Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: remove try_to_munlock from vmscan Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:53 ` Rik van Riel
2008-11-24 17:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-11-24 19:29 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2008-12-01 20:16 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-12-02 0:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:05 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: remove gfp_mask from add_to_swap Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: add add_to_swap stub Hugh Dickins
2008-11-23 22:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-11-24 13:49 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-11-24 13:53 ` [PATCH 9/8] mm: optimize get_scan_ratio for no swap Hugh Dickins
2008-11-24 14:11 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0811241928260.3700@blonde.site \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox