From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:28:24 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] cpu alloc stage 2 In-Reply-To: <20081113103510.4a6a1d3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20081105231634.133252042@quilx.com> <20081112175717.4a1fd679.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081113103510.4a6a1d3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, travis@sgi.com, Vegard Nossum List-ID: On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I will push out a new patchset and tree in the next hour or so for > > you to merge into linux-next. > > Why not just add these to the cpu_alloc tree I already have? What happens if there are problems with the next stage? I want to make sure that at least the basis is merged. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org