From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:20:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: SLUB defrag pull request? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1223883004.31587.15.camel@penberg-laptop> <48FE6306.6020806@linux-foundation.org> <84144f020810221348j536f0d84vca039ff32676e2cc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, hugh@veritas.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > So again, just checking d_lru should do work fine. There's absolutely > no need to mess with extra references in a separate phase, which leads > to lots of complications. Then try it the way I outlined it by skipping the get() stage. You just need to add checks for the poison in case debugging is on and then you should be fine. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org