From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:32:39 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <661de9470804290752w1dc0cfb3k72e81d828a45765e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ross Biro Cc: Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , Kamalesh Babulal List-ID: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh > wrote: > > Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll > > relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one > > I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa > showed no real change. Worth checking 2.6.24, yes. But you've already made it clear that you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably) need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org