From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:04:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Warning on memory offline (and possible in usual migration?) In-Reply-To: <20080416121003.8440caf4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20080414145806.c921c927.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080415191350.0dc847b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080416092334.2dabce2c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080416112341.ef1d5452.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080416121003.8440caf4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , npiggin@suse.de, Andrew Morton , GOTO List-ID: On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > BTW, a bit off-topic. > I found I can't do memory offline when I use SLAB not SLUB, Ah. SLAB depends on GFP_THISNODE to force the page allocator to allocate on a certain and since we broke that it does strange things. SLUB lets the page allocator figure out which node to use. GFP_THISNODE is only used if the caller specifies it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org