From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] mmu notifier #v12 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Nick Piggin , Steve Wise , Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins List-ID: On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > The difference with #v11 is a different implementation of mm_lock that > guarantees handling signals in O(N). It's also more lowlatency friendly. Ok. So the rest of the issues remains unaddressed? I am glad that we finally settled on the locking. But now I will have to clean this up, address the remaining issues, sequence the patches right, provide docs, handle the merging issue etc etc? I have seen no detailed review of my patches that you include here. We are going down the same road as we had to go with the OOM patches where David Rientjes and me had to deal with the issues you raised? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org