From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [patch 5/9] Convert anon_vma lock to rw_sem and refcount Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20080401205531.986291575@sgi.com> <20080401205636.777127252@sgi.com> <20080402175058.GR19189@duo.random> <20080402215604.GU19189@duo.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080402215604.GU19189@duo.random> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: steiner@sgi.com, Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, Izik Eidus , Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins List-Id: linux-mm.kvack.org On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > paging), hence the slowdown. What you benchmarked is the write side, > which is also the fast path when the system is heavily CPU bound. I've > to say aim is a great benchmark to test this regression. I am a bit surprised that brk performance is that important. There may be other measurement that have to be made to assess how this would impact a real load.