From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [14/14] vcompound: Avoid vmalloc for ehash_locks In-Reply-To: <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> Message-ID: References: <20080321061703.921169367@sgi.com> <20080321061727.491610308@sgi.com> <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Eric Dumazet Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Netdev List List-ID: On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote: > But, isnt it defeating the purpose of this *particular* vmalloc() use ? I thought that was controlled by hashdist? I did not see it used here and so I assumed that the RR was not intended here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org