From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: melgor@ie.ibm.com, apw@shadowen.org, agl@us.ibm.com,
wli@holomorphy.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Explicitly retry hugepage allocations
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:30:53 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802061529480.22648@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080206231243.GG3477@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Add __GFP_REPEAT to hugepage allocations. Do so to not necessitate
> userspace putting pressure on the VM by repeated echo's into
> /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages to grow the pool. With the previous patch to
> allow for large-order __GFP_REPEAT attempts to loop for a bit (as
> opposed to indefinitely), this increases the likelihood of getting
> hugepages when the system experiences (or recently experienced) load.
>
> On a 2-way x86_64, this doubles the number of hugepages (from 10 to 20)
> obtained while compiling a kernel at the same time. On a 4-way ppc64,
> a similar scale increase is seen (from 3 to 5 hugepages). Finally, on a
> 2-way x86, this leads to a 5-fold increase in the hugepages allocatable
> under load (90 to 554).
Hmmm... How about defaulting to __GFP_REPEAT by default for larger page
allocations? There are other users of larger allocs that would also
benefit from the same measure. I think it would be fine as long as we are
sure to fail at some point.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-06 23:07 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Smarter retry of costly-order allocations Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-02-06 23:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Explicitly retry hugepage allocations Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-02-06 23:30 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-02-07 1:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-02-08 17:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-02-08 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:40 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-02-08 23:42 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0802061529480.22648@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=melgor@ie.ibm.com \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox