From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:08:39 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: fix misleading __GFP_REPEAT related comments In-Reply-To: <20080206230512.GE3477@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20080206230512.GE3477@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: melgor@ie.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > To clarify, the flags' semantics are: > > __GFP_NORETRY means try no harder than one run through __alloc_pages > > __GFP_REPEAT means __GFP_NOFAIL The __GFP_REPEAT == __GFP_NOFAIL? If so then remove __GFP_REPEAT. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org