From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:11:14 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h In-Reply-To: <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20080108211023.923047000@sgi.com> <20080108211025.293924000@sgi.com> <1199906905.9834.101.camel@localhost> <1199908430.9834.104.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, Andi Kleen , Jack Steiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com List-ID: On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote: > Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other patch > set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end anyway. It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to simplify the next patchset. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org