From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:03:26 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Fwd: comparion: solaris 10 vs RHEL5 - memory In-Reply-To: <20080105173952.0b8db5f3@bree.surriel.com> Message-ID: References: <6101e8c40801040739i4d7f6e58rbd9b6d68e4565bc7@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40801040821i495747f2ref1a0df711c23ea@mail.gmail.com> <20080105173952.0b8db5f3@bree.surriel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: "Oliver Pinter (=?UTF-8?B?UGludMOpciBPbGl2w6ly?=)" , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Maximum RAM: > > * 2 TB on current hardware -> solaris10 > > * 256 GB on X64 -> RHEL5 > > The amount listed for RHEL is not the theoretical maximum, but > the largest amount that has actually been tested. The limits are > different per architecture. We just deployed a Linux system at NASA with 4TB RAM and 4096 cores (IA64). http://www.nas.nasa.gov/ But there are systems with more memory out there like the one in Munich with 16TB: http://192.48.170.160/pdfs/4007.pdf -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org