linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:40:46 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061834340.5424@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071106212305.6aa3a4fe@bree.surriel.com>

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Also, a factor 16 increase in page size is not going to help
> if memory sizes also increase by a factor 16, since we already 
> have trouble with today's memory sizes.

Note that a factor 16 increase usually goes hand in hand with
more processors. The synchronization of multiple processors becomes a 
concern. If you have an 8p and each of them tries to get the zone locks 
for reclaim then we are already in trouble. And given the immaturity
of the handling of cacheline contention in current commodity hardware this 
is likely to result in livelocks and/or starvation on some level.

> > I think that is the most urgent issue at hand. At least for us.
> 
> For some workloads this is the most urgent change, indeed.
> Since the patches for this already exist, integrating them
> is at the top of my list.  Expect this to be integrated into
> the split VM patch series by the end of this week.

Good to hear.
 
> > > - switch to SEQ replacement for the anon LRU lists, so the
> > >   worst case number of pages to scan is reduced greatly.
> > 
> > No idea what that is?
> 
> See http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign

A bit sparse but limiting the scanning if we cannot do much is certainly 
the right thing to do. The percentage of memory taken up by anonymous 
pages varies depending on the load. HPC applications may consume all of 
memory with anonymous pages. But there the pain is already so bad that 
many users go to huge pages already which bypasses the VM.

> > We do not have an accepted standard load. So how would we figure that one 
> > out?
> 
> The current worst case is where we need to scan all of memory, 
> just to find a few pages we can swap out.  With the effects of
> lock contention figured in, this can take hours on huge systems.

Right but I think this looks like a hopeless situation regardless of the 
algorithm if you have a couple of million pages and are trying to free 
one. Now image a series of processors going on the hunt for the few pages 
that can be reclaimed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-03 22:42 Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/10] move isolate_lru_page to vmscan.c Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:13   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-03 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/10] free swap space entries if vm_swap_full() Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:20   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:48     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/10] define page_file_cache Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:23   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:55     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  3:02       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  3:17         ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  3:26           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07 14:35             ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 18:06               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07 18:17                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 18:18                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-03 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/10] debug page_file_cache Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 22:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/10] use an indexed array for LRU lists and variables Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:01 ` [RFC PATCH 6/10] split anon and file LRUs Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:28   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  3:00     ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:02 ` [RFC PATCH 7/10] clean up the LRU array arithmetic Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:03 ` [RFC PATCH 8/10] make split VM and lumpy reclaim work together Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:04 ` [RFC PATCH 9/10] split VM and memory controllers Rik van Riel
2007-11-03 23:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] add swapped in pages to the inactive list Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:11 ` [RFC PATCH 0/10] split anon and file LRUs Christoph Lameter
2007-11-07  2:23   ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07  2:40     ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-11-07  2:51       ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 17:59         ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-07 18:16           ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061834340.5424@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox