From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:14:12 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka J Enberg Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock and slab_unlock. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20071028033156.022983073@sgi.com> <20071028033300.479692380@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Matthew Wilcox , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > > + __release(bitlock); > > This needs a less generic name and maybe a comment explaining that it's > not annotating a proper lock? Or maybe we can drop it completely? Ah, I see that does the same thing, so strike that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org