From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size In-Reply-To: <46EEE80D.6060808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <1189812002.5826.31.camel@lappy> <20070917215615.685a5378@lappy> <46EEE80D.6060808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Balbir Singh Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: > Please do let me know if someone finds a good standard test for it or a > way to stress reclaim. I've heard AIM7 come up often, but never been > able to push it much. I should retry. AIM7 does small computing loads reflecting an earlier time. I wish there was something better reflecting large computing loads of today. The tests that I know of require MPI and other libraries and are not that suitable for kernel hackers. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org