From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:20:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements In-Reply-To: <20070913141704.4623ac57.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070830185053.22619.96398.sendpatchset@localhost> <1189527657.5036.35.camel@localhost> <1189691837.5013.43.camel@localhost> <20070913182344.GB23752@skynet.ie> <20070913141704.4623ac57.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mel Gorman , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, mtk-manpages@gmx.net, solo@google.com, eric.whitney@hp.com List-ID: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:26:19 -0700 (PDT) > Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > What do you see holding it up? Is it the fact we are no longer doing the > > > pointer packing and you don't want that structure to exist, or is it simply > > > a case that 2.6.23 is too close the door and it won't get adequate > > > coverage in -mm? > > > > No its not the pointer packing. The problem is that the patches have not > > been merged yet and 2.6.23 is close. We would need to merge it very soon > > and get some exposure in mm. Andrew? > > You rang? > > To which patches do you refer? "Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements"? > That's still in my queue somewhere, but a) it has "RFC" in it which usually > makes me run away and b) we already have no fewer than 221 memory > management patches queued. To Mel's one zonelist patchset that is supposed to supplant the numa policy "hack" merged in .23. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org