From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:22:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements In-Reply-To: <1189698566.5013.72.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20070830185053.22619.96398.sendpatchset@localhost> <1189527657.5036.35.camel@localhost> <1189698566.5013.72.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, mtk-manpages@gmx.net, solo@google.com, eric.whitney@hp.com, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > Andi thought this was important enough to go in to 23 as a bug fix. I > think it's at least as important as the one you acked. However, I don't > know that anyone has ever cited a problem with it. Then again, they > might not notice if they occasionally leak a mempolicy struct, or use a > freed or reused one for page allocation. I'd be happier to see it cook > in -mm for a while. So, I'll go ahead and rebase atop Mel's patches. > > Thoughts? There is the concern about performance issues because of new refcounter increments. I thought you said that you wanted to do performance tests first? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org