From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd) In-Reply-To: <20070904141055.e00a60d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <46DDC017.4040301@sgi.com> <20070904141055.e00a60d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mike Travis , steiner@sgi.com, ak@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-ID: On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for > > the above define? (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-) > > It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures? That is certainly the cleanest solution. Maybe we can only convert the variables used in the scheduler that way? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org