From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dkegel@google.com,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] shrink_page_list: Support isolating dirty pages on laundry list
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:53:53 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708211351210.3082@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070821150440.GK11329@skynet.ie>
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > + if (list_empty(page_list))
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> This needs a comment to explain why shrink_page_list() would be called
> with an empty list.
Ok.
> > @@ -407,10 +413,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
> > if (TestSetPageLocked(page))
> > goto keep;
> >
> > - VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
> > -
>
> This needs explanation in the leader. It implies that later you expect active
> and inactive pages to be passed to shrink_page. i.e. We now need to keep an
> eye out for where shrink_active_list() is sending pages to shrink_page_list()
> instead of simply rotating the active list to the inactive.
Ok.
>
> > sc->nr_scanned++;
> >
> > + if (PageActive(page))
> > + goto keep_locked;
> > +
> > if (!sc->may_swap && page_mapped(page))
> > goto keep_locked;
> >
> > @@ -506,6 +513,12 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
> > if (!may_write_to_queue(mapping->backing_dev_info))
> > goto keep_locked;
> >
> > + if (laundry) {
> > + list_add(&page->lru, laundry);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> This needs a comment. What you are doing is explained in the leader but
> it may not help a future reader of the code.
>
> Also, with laundry specified there is no longer a check for PagePrivate
> to see if the buffers can be freed and got rid of. According to the
> comments in the next code block;
The check for buffers comes after the writeout. Writeout occurs when
laundry == NULL.
>
> * We do this even if the page is PageDirty().
> * try_to_release_page() does not perform I/O, but it is
> * possible for a page to have PageDirty set, but it is actually
> * clean (all its buffers are clean)
>
> Is this intentional?
Yes buffers will be removed after writeout. Writeout requires buffers.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-21 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-20 21:50 [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 1/7] release_lru_pages(): Generic release of pages to the LRU Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 14:52 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-21 20:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 2/7] Move checks from pageout() to shrink_page_list Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 3/7] shrink_page_list: Support isolating dirty pages on laundry list Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 15:04 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-21 20:53 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 4/7] Pass laundry through shrink_inactive_list() and shrink_zone() Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 5/7] Laundry handling for direct reclaim Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 15:06 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-21 20:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 15:19 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-21 21:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 6/7] kswapd: Do laundry after reclaim Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 21:50 ` [RFC 7/7] Switch of PF_MEMALLOC during writeout Christoph Lameter
2007-08-20 23:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 23:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 1:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-21 10:36 ` [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-21 20:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-21 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 21:43 ` Rik van Riel
2007-08-21 22:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-23 12:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-08-23 20:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 22:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-21 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-22 7:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-22 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-22 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-22 20:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-23 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-26 4:52 ` Rik van Riel
2007-08-23 12:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-08-22 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-22 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-23 12:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-08-23 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-21 15:16 ` Rik van Riel
2007-08-21 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2007-08-21 21:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 15:51 ` Dave McCracken
2007-08-21 21:03 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0708211351210.3082@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dkegel@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox