From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2][UPDATED] hugetlb: search harder for memory in alloc_fresh_huge_page() In-Reply-To: <20070807221240.GB15714@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070807171432.GY15714@us.ibm.com> <1186517722.5067.31.camel@localhost> <20070807221240.GB15714@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , anton@samba.org, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > Not that I don't trust __GFP_THISNODE, but may I suggest a > > "VM_BUG_ON(page_to_nid(page) != nid)" -- up above the spin_lock(), of > > course. Better yet, add the assertion and drop this one line change? Dont do this change. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org