From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
ak@suse.de, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: NUMA policy issues with ZONE_MOVABLE
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:56:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021152370.7719@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070802140904.GA16940@skynet.ie>
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Hence the regression test is dependant on timing. The question is if the values
> should always be up-to-date when read from userspace. I put together one patch
> that would refresh the counters when numastat or vmstat was being read but it
> requires a per-cpu function to be called. This may be undesirable as it would
> be punishing on large systems running tools that frequently read /proc/vmstat
> for example. Was it done this way on purpose? The comments around the stats
> code would led me to believe this lag is on purpose to avoid per-cpu calls.
The lag was introduced with the vm statistics rework since ZVCs use
deferred updates. We could call refresh_vm_stats before handing out the
counters?
> The alternative was to apply this patch to numactl so that the
> regression test waits on the timers to update. With this patch, the
> regression tests passed on a 4-node x86_64 machine.
Another possible solution. Andi: Which solution would you prefer?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-25 4:20 Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 4:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-25 5:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 5:24 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-25 6:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 6:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-25 9:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-25 6:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-25 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-25 14:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 4:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-26 4:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 7:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-26 16:16 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-26 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 18:26 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-26 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-26 18:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-26 22:59 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-27 1:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-27 8:20 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-27 15:45 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-27 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-27 17:46 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-27 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-27 18:00 ` [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy - V2 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 18:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-27 19:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-27 19:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-27 18:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-27 19:24 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 15:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-31 16:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 19:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31 19:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 19:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-31 20:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-31 20:48 ` [PATCH] Document Linux Memory Policy - V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-03 13:52 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-28 7:28 ` NUMA policy issues with ZONE_MOVABLE KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-28 11:57 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-28 14:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-28 14:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-07-30 12:41 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-30 18:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-27 14:24 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-01 18:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 0:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-08-02 17:10 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 17:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-26 18:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-02 14:09 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 18:56 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-08-02 19:42 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-02 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-03 9:32 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-03 16:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-25 14:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-07-25 17:39 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021152370.7719@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox