From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:06:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: NUMA policy issues with ZONE_MOVABLE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070725111646.GA9098@skynet.ie> <20070726132336.GA18825@skynet.ie> <20070726225920.GA10225@skynet.ie> <20070727082046.GA6301@skynet.ie> <20070727154519.GA21614@skynet.ie> <20070728162844.9d5b8c6e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070728231032.2ec7bd35.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20070728232154.d84f0bcb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pj@sgi.com List-ID: On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > The results from kernbench were mixed. Small improves on some machines and > small regressions on others. I'll keep the patch on the stack and investigate > it further with other benchmarks. Optimize the scanning by encodeing the zone type in the pointer. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org