From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:48:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: SLUB: Style fix up the loop to disable small slabs In-Reply-To: <20070706134043.e572eb7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070706134043.e572eb7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > ugh, six slab patches, no sequence numbers. > > What is the applying order? Below the order in which they were sent. They should apply that way. The only dependencies AFAIK is that 4 depends on 3. 1. SLUB: Style fix up the loop to disable small slabs 2. SLUB: Do not use length parameter in slab_alloc() 3. Slab allocators: Cleanup zeroing allocations 4. Slab allocators: Replace explicit zeroing with __GF 5. SLUB: Do not allocate object bit array on stack 6. SLUB: Move sysfs operations outside of slub_lock 7. SLUB: Fix CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG use for CONFIG_NUMA -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org