From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:32:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops In-Reply-To: <84144f020706191358j1992dd50ga5d93efbd61878d6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20070618095838.238615343@sgi.com> <20070618095916.083793990@sgi.com> <84144f020706191358j1992dd50ga5d93efbd61878d6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com List-ID: On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 6/18/07, clameter@sgi.com wrote: > > We use the parameter formerly used by the destructor to pass an optional > > pointer to a kmem_cache_ops structure to kmem_cache_create. > > > > kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops. > > I like kmem_cache_ops but I don't like this patch. I know its painful > but we really want the introduction patch to fixup the API (move ctor > to kmem_cache_ops and do the callers). That can be done later. The effort does not increase because of this patch. If you have the time please do such a patch. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org