From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:30:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] slob: poor man's NUMA, take 5. In-Reply-To: <20070615033412.GA28687@linux-sh.org> Message-ID: References: <20070615033412.GA28687@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Paul Mundt Cc: Matt Mackall , Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Paul Mundt wrote: > This version adds in a slob_def.h and reorders a bit of the slab.h > definitions. This should take in to account all of the outstanding > comments so far on the earlier versions. Why are the comments on kmalloc moved() from slab.h to slob_def.h? The comments are only partially correct. So they probably can do less harm in slob_def.h. May be good if you could move them back and in the process make them accurate? Acked-by: Christoph Lameter -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org