From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] populated_map: fix !NUMA case, remove comment In-Reply-To: <20070613231825.GX3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <1181677473.5592.149.camel@localhost> <20070612200125.GG3798@us.ibm.com> <1181748606.6148.19.camel@localhost> <20070613175802.GP3798@us.ibm.com> <20070613230906.GV3798@us.ibm.com> <20070613231825.GX3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Well...maybe we can do better by just adding another GFP flag? > > GFP_ONLYTHISNODE? > > THISNODE has the current semantics, that the "closest" node is > preferred, which may be local, and it will succeed if memory exists > somewhere for the allocation you want (I think). No we want one GFP_THISNODE working in a consistent way. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org