From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:39:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] NUMA: introduce node_memory_map In-Reply-To: <20070612213612.GH3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070612204843.491072749@sgi.com> <20070612205738.309078596@sgi.com> <20070612213612.GH3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: David Rientjes , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, Lee Schermerhorn List-ID: > Indeed, I did and (I like to think) I helped write the patches :) The patches contain your signoff because of your authorship... > We can keep > > node_set_memory() > node_clear_memory() > > but change node_memory() to node_has_memory() ? Hmmm.... That deviates from how the other node_xxx() things are so it disturbed my sense of order. We have no three word node_is/has_xxx yet. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org