From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] NUMA: introduce node_memory_map In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070612204843.491072749@sgi.com> <20070612205738.309078596@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@suse.de, Nishanth Aravamudan , Lee Schermerhorn List-ID: On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Rientjes wrote: > I think the problem is that online and possible are adverbs and > adjectives, respectively, and memory is a noun. That's why when it > appears in source code, it doesn't make a lot of sense for node_memory to > return a boolean value. I suspect it would return the memory, whatever > that is. A sentence such as "This is a memory node" in opposition to "This is a memoryless nide" would put memory to use as an adjective. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org