From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:10:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add populated_map to account for memoryless nodes In-Reply-To: <20070612200012.GE3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070611202728.GD9920@us.ibm.com> <20070611221036.GA14458@us.ibm.com> <1181657940.5592.19.camel@localhost> <1181675840.5592.123.camel@localhost> <20070612194951.GC3798@us.ibm.com> <20070612200012.GE3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Kamezawa Hiroyuki List-ID: On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > These are terrible names :) Something more like node_set_has_memory(node) > and node_set_has_no_memory(node), maybe? [why be arbitrarily different > than node_set_{on,off}line?]. Because node_set_on/off is already inconsisted with node_set and node_clear. Another possible name may be node_clear_has_memory node_clear_has_memory but that is awkward. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org