From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:00:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add populated_map to account for memoryless nodes In-Reply-To: <1181674482.5592.98.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20070611202728.GD9920@us.ibm.com> <1181657433.5592.11.camel@localhost> <20070612173521.GX3798@us.ibm.com> <1181674482.5592.98.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen List-ID: On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > Perhaps. But, be aware that allocating pages via the 'hugepages' boot > parameter or the vm.nr_hugepages sysctl won't spread pages evenly--on > our platforms, anyway--if we don't get this right. From what I've seen > in the mailing lists, this approach [fixing it up with the per node > attributes] runs counter to the general approach of having the kernel > figure it out. Hmm.. shmem does the same with the boot parameter there? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org