From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] populated_map: fix !NUMA case, remove comment In-Reply-To: <20070612172858.GV3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070611234155.GG14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612000705.GH14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612020257.GF3798@us.ibm.com> <20070612023209.GJ3798@us.ibm.com> <20070612032055.GQ3798@us.ibm.com> <1181660782.5592.50.camel@localhost> <20070612172858.GV3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > And yes, I think the per-node attribute will fix most of the interface > problems for 'odd' NUMA systems. Right. The definition of populate_node needs to be clear. We agreed that it is a node with memory. If we want to add further restrictions on the type of memory being used on the node then we can add further maps if necessary or have the subsystem manage a nodelist of allowed nodes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org